Showing posts with label Brisbane. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brisbane. Show all posts

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Local News Wrap - January 1-14 2011

Cricket

England complete Ashes rout
There was a bizarre feeling at the opening day of the 5th and final Ashes test in Sydney last week. I can attest to it as I was there personally. Although it would be harsh to claim it was an anticlimax, with a packed house piling into the SCG, there was definitely a feeling of perverse irony in all the hearty gusto with which the local fans cheered for the Aussies. As a test match it fast became a never ending tedious anti-climax, or a four day carnival of wonderment if you're English. England were not as devastatingly good as they'd been in Adelaide and Melbourne with bat or ball. Nor were Australia quite so bad as they had been at times during the series. Yet the game ended up every bit as distressingly lopsided, with England amassing their highest ever score in Australia, 644, on their way to a third innings win of the series.

Full scorecard.

Old rivals split short form pair
Although there remains a semblance of novelty and superfluousness to the Twenty20 game, it provided two particularly enjoyable contests this week. The spectre of Australia's Ashes horror meant that the traditional early January T20s were treated with amusingly over exuberant gusto instead of the usual lazy indifference. There have been higher quality games, but both went to the last over and for once it was an intriguing contest between bat and ball, not a nauseating six-a-thon.

England took a thrilling Game One when debutant Chris Woakes scored the necessary 158th run from the last ball of the match, off the bowling of poor old Shane Watson who smashed a wonderful 59 and took four wickets to boot, and still couldn't find himself on the winning team. Game two followed a similar formula, with more frustrating middle order performances limiting Australia to only 147. It would have been worse if not for the efforts of young Aaron Finch who hit an enterprising 53 not out off 33 balls. England looked comfortable with openers Ian Bell and Steve Davies at the crease but after a vital two-wicket over from Mitchell Johnson, the middle order stumbled. Watson once again was a standout with the ball and the pace trio of Lee, Tait and Johnson managed to withstand some late scares and hold on for a much needed 4 run win.

Game 1 scorecard.
Game 2 scorecard.


Football

Socceroos survive medical nightmare

The Asian Cup continues to throw up drama and surprises into its second week. Three time champions and general Asian superpower Saudi Arabia have already booked their tickets home with a shock 1-0 loss to Jordan, following up their 2-1 defeat to Syria in the first game. China also find themselves with a face full of egg after an unexpected 2-0 lesson at the hands of hosts Qatar. Australia's group seems on schedule to finish with the Socceroos and Koreans tied atop the table on seven points after they played out a scrappy but enthralling 1-1 draw. The Socceroos had the better of the first half chances after some good set piece play but found themselves 1-0 down after a defensive lapse in the centre of the park. Mile Jedinak equalised midway through the second half with his first international goal as the Socceroos continued to show impressive elements, but made far too many silly errors and couldn't match the sensational fast passing game of South Korea.

The biggest concern for the Socceroos is a trio of potentially tournament ending injuries to Jason Culina, Luke Wilkshire and David Carney. Culina's central midfield slot should not be hard to fill with Carl Valeri and Matt McKay showing good form, but the respective flank positions in the defensive line could be a bigger problem.

Roar paddle through flood waters
The devastating floods in South-East Queensland have had a profound impact on many in the sporting community. Australian and English cricketers and their respective boards have gone to particular efforts to provide financial support, and today saw a novelty fundraiser featuring the stars of the Tennis world in the lead up to the Australian Open. But it is the A-League who have, in unimportant sporting terms, been affected most of all. The runaway league leaders Brisbane Roar have trained on four different grounds in the past fortnight, and this week found their iconic home Suncorp Stadium under water. Sunday's game against the Wellington Phoenix has been postponed until January 26 but it appears that potentially the entire of the Suncorp's remaining allotment of fixtures may need to be shifted to other grounds around greater Brisbane, or even to Gold Coast United's Skilled Park.

It remains to be seen what effect the troubles of the past week will have on the Roar, who have the luxury of an upcoming bye. If Monday was any indication though the plight of their friends and families will only spur the Roar on. As the crisis in Brisbane began to play out, the team played a thrilling high quality 3-3 draw against an impressive Central Coast Mariners in Gosford. The top 4 remains safe with the Roar, Adelaide United, Mariners and Gold Coast still by far the pick of the competition. But the battle for the remaining two places in the finals remains particularly interesting. Melbourne Victory are looking likely to qualify but are doing their best to throw it all away, with an awful performance at home last weekend, destroyed 4-1 by Adelaide following on from a 2-0 loss to the 8th placed Wellington Pheonix, keeping them within striking distance. Sydney F.C have kept their slim hopes alive with a 2-1 win visiting an inconsistent and injury ravaged Newcastle Jets who nevertheless cling to 6th. Both the Jets and 7th placed Melbourne Heart scored rather inconsequential wins over a decidedly average North Queensland Fury to start the new year, but neither have yet shown enough to consistent form to suggest a finals place is in the bag.

Tennis

Hewitt pulls Kooyong surprise
Preparations are complete for the Australian Open which begins tomorrow at Melbourne Park. Aside from the odd inspiring cameo from names like Molik, Stosur and Dokic, local fans have had precious little to celebrate in the recent past. 2011's edition may not be different in the grand scheme, with Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal looking unbeatable and Kim Clijsters' favouritism shortening every day. But the signs have been promising this week. Hewitt, the clear outsider in ranking terms, took a somewhat unexpected trophy at the disappointingly tiny and insubstantial but still high quality AAMI classic at Kooyong. Hewitt scored three impressive wins over top players. Russian top 10 stars Mikhail Youzhny and Nikolay Davydenko were both quality conquests, and Hewitt wrapped up the title with a 7-5, 6-3 win over Gael Monfils. Hewitt will need all the form he can muster, for a first round clash with the class of long time rival David Nalbandian, who has come off a strong performance in Auckland where he was runner-up to David Ferrer in the Heineken Cup.

Aussie women reverse roles
There is massive hype around Samantha Stosur going into the Australian Open. The world No.6 who reached her first grand slam final in Paris in 2010, is seeded No.5 for the tournament, the highest Australian women's seed since Wendy Turnbull in 1984. However it was not Stosur who flew the flag for the Aussie girls this week but young up and comer Jarmila Groth. Groth took out her second WTA title this week at the Hobart International, beating fellow young sensation Bethanie Mattek-Sands of the United States. It follows Groth's maiden title at the Guangzhou International open in China just four months ago. Stosur meanwhile went out in the second round of the Sydney International to former World No.1 Svetlana Kuznetsova. Despite the setback, Stosur's challenge still looks on track. Kuznetsova was particularly impressive and Stosur gives every indication of being a woman who is peaking at the exact right time.

Friday, December 17, 2010

This Week in Sporting History: THE TIED TEST

Australia vs West Indies,1960/61 - 1st Test
Wooloongabba, Brisbane
December 9-14 1960

West Indies: 453 (Sobers 132, Worrell 65, Solomon 65, Davidson 5/135)
Australia: 505 (O'Neill 181, Simpson 92, Hall 4/140)
West Indies: 284 (Worrell 65, Kanhai 54, Davidson 6/87)
Australia: 232 (Davidson 80, Benaud 52, Hall 5/63)

MATCH TIED

The West Indies celebrate as Joe Solomon 
affects the most famous run-out in cricket history.

This week exactly fifty years ago saw the famous Tied Test, the first ever instance of a complete Test Match finished with both teams equal on the same total (constituting a TIE as opposed to the common DRAW occurring when the 5 days expire without a completed result) in the 498 match and 83 year history of Test Cricket up to that point. The story of this iconic match has gone down in legend, indisputably the greatest ever cricket match (not just for the final drama but on overall quality throughout the match) to anyone lucky enough to have witnessed it.

The wider context of this historic match has perpetuated its legend. As the 1950s wore down Test Cricket was becoming increasingly dull and was entering a period of extreme divisiveness, with the real danger of losing fans in their drones. Frank Worrell, now a West Indies legend perhaps more for his endearing personality than his cricket, led a star-studded West Indies team to Australia which for the first time ever, was rated a genuine chance of challenging and beating the hosts. Worrell had in recent times become the first ever black West Indian captain, a major milestone in the history of a predominantly anglo-centric sport (India were still young in their independence and retained white-anglo elements, and Pakistan had barely yet registered as an international force). Worrell's team and the Richie Benaud led Australians gathered in Brisbane in 50 years ago this week for the series opener, two of the game's greatest ever figures as captains going out for the opening toss. What ensued was not only five days of competitive Test Cricket and pure theatre of the highest order, but five whole Tests of similar quality, resplendent with vibrant aggressive play and in played in a spirit consigned forever to the realsm of fantasy in the modern age. Record crowd figured flocked to all five Tests, matches which in many views, single-handedly recharged Test Cricket into its popular heights of the next decade and beyond.

As for the actual match, The West Indies won the toss and batted. Some wonderful enterprising batting from the god-like genius Sir Garfield Sobers saw him make 132, an innings Benaud described as the greatest innings he ever witnessed. An astonishing 50 from fast bowling No.10 batsman Wes Hall then helped carry the total to beyond 400, the Windies making a strong 453, at a 3.37 run rate which would be impressive even by today's standards. But the Australians were equal to the task, making full use of the flat wicket to amass 505, spearheaded by a majestic 181 from Norman O'Neill, an innings criminally underrated in the annals of cricketing history. As the pitch began to show signs of wear, The West Indies fought hard to 284, on the back of another stodgy captain's 65 from Worrell. This left Australia little more than five hours on a patchy final day wicket to make 233. Hall was in his element and ripped through the Aussie top order, reducing an ominous top order to 5/57.

At 6/92 midway through the day captain Benaud joined Australia's bowling hero Alan Davidson and the rest is history. Eschewing conventional logic which suggested attempting to defend for the draw, Benaud made the decision to attack and the pair put together an epic partnership, which took Australia to within a whisker of victory. But with just seven runs remaining a suicidal call from Benaud ran Davidson out for a magnificent career best 80. Enter the final either ball over and Australia found themselves needing six runs to win, with three wickets left. After a single from wicket keeper Wally Grout, Benaud was caught behind of a wild barely controlled bouncer from the bounding Hall from 52. A thigh-smashing scrambled leg-bye and a woefully grassed catch by Hall later and 3 runs were needed from 3 balls. No.10 batsman proceeded to slog Hall beyond where any modern rope would stand, but a spectacular chase and direct hit throw (from upwards of 75 metres) from Conrad Hunte caught Grout short going for the 3rd and winning run. This brought in Australia's final man Lindsay Kline with the scores tied. Kline tapped the penultimate ball square and called Meckiff through for a scrambling single. From almost exactly side-on, with one stump visible, Joe Solomon's aim was true and Meckiff was run out. The West Indians jumped for joy, most presuming they'd won. Australian players and fans were unsure which team had won, if either, so implausibly unlikely was the concept of such a long form contest finishing tied. Finally once the confusion settled the astonishing reality became clear. Cricket's first tied Test. Half a century later the result has only been repeated once, between India and Australia in similarly dramatic circumstances in 1986.

For the record Australia won the 5 Test series 2-1, after 25 days of supreme Test cricket and thanks largely to a miraculous draw in the 4th Test where Ken Mackay and that poor No.11 Kline again, batted for nearly two hours at 9 wickets down, preventing the West Indies from taking the final wicket to win the match.

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

FINAL REPORT: Cook and Trott ensure remarkable draw

Australia vs England, 1st Test - Day 5
Monday November 29 2010.

England - 260 (Bell 76, Cook 67, Siddle 6/54)
Australia - 481 (Hussey 195, Haddin 136, Finn 6/125)
England - 1 dec 519 (Cook 235 n.o, Trott 135 n.o, Strauss 110, North 1/47)
Australia - 1/101 (Ponting 51 n.o, Watson 41 n.o, Broad 1/18)


MATCH DRAWN

MotM - Alastair Cook (Eng)
5 Test series level 0-0 after 1 Test

Full scorecard here.



So the 1st Test of this summer's much anticipated Ashes series is complete, and the status quo is maintained. There was something distinctly anticlimactic about the last session on Monday as the match petered to an obvious draw, after weeks of hype and four days of high quality Test cricket. But nevertheless the status quo that the 0-0 scoreline claims to portray is far from how it feels, particularly as an Australian. The distressing manner of Australia's bowling meltdown resulting in the draw means the teams move to Adelaide for the 2nd test on Friday with a clear psychological field of play, England with the upper hand. The amazing feats throughout the first Test, combined with its eventual result after it all, mean this week feels almost like an extended hype and build up. Rather than a more down to earth feeling of 'OK the series has begun' leading to a 2nd Test, instead we remain in a pre-1st Test kind of agonizing limbo, but magnified a hundred times. It is still impossible to pick the outcome of this series. Spectacular highlights and glaring problems remain in both camps.

The 1st Test felt like a strange bastard child of the past three Ashes series, from the 2005esque spectacular drama and compellingness of contest, to Australia slowly but surely developing a 2006-07esque upper advantage at home. In the end, looking back at a Test littered with spectacular moments and feats from individuals, I am left with a 2009 reminiscent feeling that both these sides are far below the quality they should be and that The Ashes could be a case of who screws up the least over five tests.

Monday’s final day provided, as was feared, with more of the same following on from Day 4. Alastair Cook and Jonathon Trott, resuming at 1/309, continued to put Australia’s faltering bowlers to the sword as they quickly snuffed out any remote hopes of an Australia victory. Michael Clarke summed up Australia’s day with a truly atrocious dropped catch at first slip. That chance, as well as a late difficult grass from Ponting both came from the bowling of Shane Watson who looked easily the most threatening yet was barely used. Many arguments are made that Watson needs to be moved down the batting order so as to free up more bowling duties, but I wonder if such a move is necessary and if we, or more importantly Ponting, underestimate his fitness and ability to back up. Although the game was never realistically winnable, England nevertheless were always going to declare at some point, in order to get a thoroughly demoralised Australia back in grudgingly and cause more damage. By the time this call came from Strauss England was an astonishing and rather nightmarish 1 wicket for 519.

Alastair Cook finished with an epic unbeaten 235. Cook is a batsman free of large flourish who seems to be nothing but walking technique, and whose technique considering that is rather flawed, yet somehow he now has 14 test hundreds before the age of 26. England’s top 6 consists of Strauss, Pietersen, Collingwood and Bell, all vastly experienced and proven class acts (albeit less so against Australia for Bell). Before the series Australia surely spoke of two batsmen as potential strike zones. Firstly: Cook, the weak link with questionable technique and questionable precedent in Australian conditions. Secondly: Trott, the debut tourist with little Test experience. Yet it was these two who put on a mammoth and unbeaten partnership of 321, duly passing Michael Hussey and Brad Haddin’s two day old record for the biggest Test partnership at Brisbane. TrottAustralia with 135 not out. Thankfully Shane Watson and Ricky Ponting prevented further psychological haemorrhaging by overcoming the early loss of Simon Katich for 4 and batting solidly until stumps. Ponting looked fantastic in an unbeaten 51 at faster than a run a ball and fairly quickly broke apart the plans of the English quicks. But their late efforts couldn’t mask the disappointment and overall trepidation looking at the rest of the series. One for 517, as much as it may prove to be a freak one-off, nevertheless is not acceptable by any standard. For their part the selectors have taken the positive step of adding fast bowlers Doug Bollinger and Ryan Harris to the 2nd test squad.

I only hope we don’t end up with a 0-0 series draw because neither team can take 20 wickets. This is an exaggeration but not by much, both bowling units look thoroughly unconvincing (thanks to Graeme Swann’s lack of substance in Brisbane). The Ashes may very easily be won and lost, just like in 2009, by the odd individual bowling brilliance. Andrew Flintoff at Lords and Stuart Broad at The Oval provided these in 2009 and coincidentally there were England’s only two wins of the series. Peter Siddle provided this time around and Australia weren’t able to capitalise. More to the point, in this landscape the Ashes may come down to which batting line-up avoids inexplicable collapses. It is through this criteria that I express frustration at Marcus North being retained in the squad, and continued annoyance at Michael Clarke’s soap opera. Australia only needs to bat solidly throughout the series and it could easily be winnable, especially as England showed a penchant for collapse in the first innings. There won’t always be a Hussey/Haddin partnership to save the day.



Highlights
*** - Ricky Ponting. Although it was to be fair, a completely inconsequential innings, Ponting's quick fire 51 not out to end the match did look suspiciously like his best form so hopefully, while I think he will still continue to fail on occasions, on those times he doesn't we might still get 2 or 3 vintage Ponting classics this summer.

** - Shane Watson. Although 41 runs and no wickets is hardly a memorable day. Watson again showed today that he is vastly underrated with the ball then backed it up with another solid looking stint with the bat. Ponting really must have faith in the man and bowl him a great deal more.

* - Alastair Cook. Shocking though it may seem I am in fact paying tribute to an Englishmen. As painful as it was to watch him bat for the best part of 11 hours, it was a wonderfully grandiose innings, one of those rare gems. Cook also unknowingly broke another of Bradman's precious records, namely taking the highest Test score at the Gabba from the Don.


Lowlights
*** - 1/517. I don't really know who I'm conclusively blaming but that score is quite absurd. Even in this new age of rebuilding and being No.5 in the world rankings, Australia have no right allowing oppositions to so thoroughly destroy us like that.


** - Surprise surprise it's Mitchell Johnson. He completed his wonderfully inadequate match by finishing with the inauspicious figures of 0/108. Rumours are that the selectors have bitten the bullet and sacked him for Adelaide. Although I wish him well and desperately hope for classic Johnson to win Test matches for Australia in the future, this man currently in the team is not the same man. Johnson must not play in Adelaide, I may not watch if he does. 


* - The Brisbane people. To be fair it was Day 5 of a Test match almost foregone to be a draw, on a working Monday. But I'm from Sydney and tend to enjoy slandering Queenslanders so I'll take this time to admonish the crowd on Monday, or lack thereof. While I too appreciate the general unimportance of a draw-headed last day, this is the Ashes and with the Barmy Army always out in force, if Aussie supporter numbers slip too low they can be usurped by English numbers. This got very close to being the case on Monday and there is a psychological principle of basic home country ethics to deal with. This is Australia, the dreaded doom land English cricket comes to die. It is insultingly unspeakable that they can play a single day of cricket in Australia in a partisan pro-English atmosphere.



Sunday, November 28, 2010

Strauss and Cook turn the tide

Australia vs England, 1st Test - Day 4
Sunday November 28 2010.


England - 260 (Bell 76, Cook 67, Siddle 6/54)
Australia - 481 (Hussey 195, Haddin 136, Finn 6/125)
England - 1/309 (Cook 132 n.o, Strauss 110, Trott 52 n.o, North 1/22)

Full scorecard here.




The first two days of this opening Ashes test at the Gabba featured captivating to and fro Test cricket. The unfailing curatorial genius of Kevin Mitchell Jr has produced another sensational pitch in keeping with Brisbane's reputation as having the best pitches in the country. The balance between bat and ball had set up a fairly even contest before yesterday, Michael Hussey and Brad Haddin blasted away any lingering thought that the pitch was anything other than flat and true for a well set batsman.

To the despairing chagrin of Australia, England openers Andrew Strauss and Alastair Cook vehemently reinforced this fact today. Cook is a strange case, going about his business quietly and usually at a slow pace and rarely being talked of with the sort of respect afforded to many players far less deserving. Here is a 25 year old man who has just achieved his 14th Test hundred. Few of even the greatest all time players can lay claim to such a tally at that early age. Today saw if not his greatest innings, certainly his most important. Cook batted through the entire day, starting slowly but ending unbeaten on a near chanceless 132.

Captain Andrew Strauss played the more exciting but also more danger-fraught innings. While Cook battled along, Strauss, after a slow start, surged past 50 and onwards on the back of devastating cuts and drives through the off side field. Ricky Ponting did his best to help the English cause, with some astonishingly petulant captaincy, at times changing his field after every ball to combat the latest inevitable English boundary. Australia's bowling was too short at times and inconsistency but, similar to England yesterday, not all that bad. Even Johnson looked better although he remains frustratingly short of spectacular best. Strauss and Cook were merely too good. Strauss brought up his hundred with a sublime cut for 4 off Xavier Doherty, who again bowled tidily and consistently but was slightly too full and fast to be truly effective on the unique Gabba surface. Marcus North, who bowled impressively for 12 overs, showed the more appropriate line and length with good flighted off spin. It was North who got the eventual breakthrough, ending the opening partnership on 188 when Strauss skipped down the wicket in a rather ungainly fashion, missed the ball as it spun away, and was calmly stumped by Haddin for 110.

This was only the beginnings of Australia's woes however, with new batsman Jonathan Trott immediately on the attack, just as Cook upped the ante and increased his scoring rate. 121 more runs came by the end of what was all in all a thoroughly depressing day to be an Australian. England go into the final day leading by 88 runs with 9 wickets in hand, with a draw now looking the most likely result.

Highlights
*** - The wicket. It is a testament to what a terrible day for Australia this was that this is the best I can do for a three star highlight. It was a sublime piece of bowling from a supposed part timer though.

** - For all my unabashed patriotism, kudos must go to England's 3 batsmen who played with great patience and judgement on a pitch that still has a bit in it, and whose cracks are really starting to show.

* - Ben Hilfenhaus. Hilfenhaus for mine was the best of the Australia bowlers, and the only one to consistently get his length right. Like James Anderson yesterday he toiled all day without luck.

Lowlights
*** - Where to begin. Although it is acutely mainstream and boring to always berate poor Ponting for his captaincy, it is with reason today, not so much for specific tactics as for his general lack of self assurance.

** - Mitchell Johnson. Poor Mitch. It's just not his Test match. First an average first innings bowling effort than making a duck. He bowled a lot better today but had the misfortune of dropping a catch off Strauss when he had 69. It wasn't an easy chance, above the head at mid-off, but it was one that should have been held.

* - This may be a bizarre point to make, and of course remaining positive is the most obvious way to keep yourself from feeling stressed and under pressure and therefore playing worse, but I was frustrated today by the happiness of the Australians, as strange as that sounds. While England smashed them to all parts of the ground, many of the Australian players, particularly Ponting, Clarke, North and Siddle seemed to be having a great laugh a great deal of the time. I admire that the Australians, for all their history of being over-intense sledgers, are showing that they can enjoy their cricket and have fun regardless of the situation. It is good to play in the spirit of the game like this but Jesus, when the opposition is 1/300 there needs to be more anger, the kind of anger that leads to a steely Aussie determination to win games of Cricket.

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Heroic partnership gives Australia command

Australia vs England, 1st Test - Day 3
Saturday November 27 2010.


England - 260 (Bell 76, Cook 67, Siddle 6/54)
Australia - 481 (Hussey 195, Haddin 136, Finn 6/125)
England - 0/19 (Strauss 11 n.o, Cook 6 n.o)

Full scorecard here.







Australia resumed on Day 3 of the 1st Ashes test at 5/220, 40 runs in arrears of England's first innings effort. With exactly 80s overs bowled Jimmy Anderson would start the day with a brand new ball in hand. There was a sense of tension, that the game was at a vital crossroads. If England bowled sufficiently well they could take early wickets and restrict Australia to a score close to, may be even below 260. As it proved they bowled extremely well, and did take an early wicket, and yet the day was so utterly and convincingly Australia's. Only one run into the day Michael Hussey was plum LBW to Anderson for 82. Hussey logically reviewed the decision, his wicket at this time was too vital not too. The ball was straight, low, hit him line and clearly careening into the stumps. But it also had pitched marginally outside leg stump, and so Hussey was saved. 82 had become 83 when Hussey was struck on the pad again. This one was completely out in every way but in his first blemish of the game, umpire Aleem Dar did not raise his finger and with Andrew Strauss' having wasted England's two reviews wastefully on 50/50 calls, nothing could be done. So it was that the newest tactical consideration in international cricket, a captain's Decision Review strategy, defined a day's play.

None of this early fortune can detract from the partnership of Michael Hussey and Brad Haddin however. They came together at a precarious 5/143 on the 2nd afternoon, pushed through to stumps adding 77 runs came out this morning with the game potentially in the balance. England's quicks, particularly the luckless Anderson bowled fabulously in the early overs, according to Haddin it was "the hardest bowling of [my] career." But they saw this period through and remained together. Lunch and Tea would come and go before they would be parted with the score at 450. The pair added 307 runs, the first ever triple century Test stand in Brisbane and the 2nd highest Australia 6th wicket stand of all time behind the legendary 346 of Jack Fingleton and Sir Donald Bradman in 1937.

Hussey's innings was a masterpiece, potentially the greatest of his career even with lady luck's early help. The emotion he poured out upon reaching his 12th century spoke of the stress and frustration of his extended lean patch and the questions over his place in the team. But he wasn't finished, moving effortlessly for 195 before falling sadly short of a maiden double hundred when a rash pull shot from Steven Finn was caught by Cook in the outfield. Haddin's contribution hopefully will not be forgotten amidst the magic of Hussey. After an excruciatingly lethargic start, Haddin took off once he reached 25 and easily outscored Hussey. As he sat on 94 with Graeme Swann tossing the ball up enticingly, no-one was surprised when he brought up his hundred with a devastating straight six. Haddin went on to 436 before finally becoming the first wicket of the day when he edged Swann to Paul Collingwood who took a pearler in the slips.

Australia's tail showed a slightly worrying lack of resistance. When 307 of 481 runs comes from one partnership the nation can't rest easily. Mitchell Johnson lumbered for half an hour without a run then was promptly bowled. Peter Siddle made 6 before a Finn bouncer fired off the back of his bat to Swann at slip. Xavier Doherty on the other hand looked very solid and continued a good trot with the bat for Tasmania by moving quite gracefully to 16 before hitting out and being caught. All these wickets fell to Ashes debutant Finn, the 21 year old taking a rather unexpected but still deserved six wicket haul.

England, with a demoralising 221 run deficit, at least managed to survive scratchily to stumps at 0/19 from 15 overs, although Strauss tried his best not to, leaving the first ball of the innings only to see it straighten into his pads. Had it been a few centimetres fuller Strauss would be going to Adelaide next week on the back of two ducks.

Highlights
*** - Michael Hussey. If Australia win this Test match, and go on to win the Ashes on the back of it, Hussey's 195 may go down in Australian cricketing folklore. As such it is already probably the best innings of his career. Hussey has been fundamentally struggling in his mind, irrespective of fluctuating performances, for the best part of two years. He has made hundreds in that time but few in the first innings and none with the kind of vibrant panache showed today. His potentially career-saving Sheffield Shield hundred for Western Australia last week looks to have profoundly shaken him out of what was starting to look worryingly like a permanent psychological rut.  

*** - Brad Haddin. It is amazing to think that today was only Haddin's 3rd test century. The years he spent waiting in the wilderness for Adam Gilchrist to retire have been followed by inconsistent performances by team overall, denying Haddin the potential conditions to make more runs. Then his 2010 was ruined by chronic tendinitis of the elbow. Today's 136 for Haddin was every bit the all time defining career milestone as Hussey's innings, the question is whether it will forever be his greatest innings, or if it will open the floodgates to more hundreds.

* - Mr Doherty. The mannerisms and general excitement of Xavier Doherty's father as he watches every ball of his son's overall rather impressive test debut have been a heartwarming quirk amidst the drama of the match. Today he showed extremely good humour and grace in dealing the thorough embarrassment of the Channel 9 cameras and commentators (whom he was listening to via the ground's cheap radio devices) when they saw fit to watch him in the stands with his wife more than actually follow the action on the ground.


Lowlights
*** - Although not a specific namedrop so much as a castigation of pretty much the entire batting order, people must remember to consider through all the hype surrounding Hussey and Haddin's mighty partnership that the entire team only scored 172 runs outside that partnership. Australia got away with bowling England out for a total lower than they are usually likely to make in the 1st innings. Our batting must be far improved to have any chance of regaining the Ashes.

** - Mitchell Johnson backed up his uninspiring bowling effort by steeling his resolve with the bat in hand. Boosted by a recent shield century Johnson is determined to show his worth as a genuine all-rounder, he needs to considering he could very soon be out of the team if his bowling is the only selection criteria. In this conscious attempt to be a serious batsmen Johnson showed a mature watchfulness in his innings which quickly descended into gratuitous pretentiousness. 33 minutes passed without a run before he was comprehensively bowled, his technique looking pretty much flawed throughout the innings in a fundamental way. Johnson needs to revert to the old idea of his carefree batting being a happy bonus for the team if he wants to score the kind of runs he did in 2008 and 2009.

* - Kevin Pietersen's moustache. Somehow in three days its awfulness has escaped by mention. But no more.

Friday, November 26, 2010

Brave Hussey leads tough fight

Australia vs England, 1st Test - Day 2
Friday November 26 2010.


England - 260 (Bell 76, Cook 67, Siddle 6/54)
Australia - 5/220 (Hussey 81 n.o, Katich 50, Anderson 2/40, Finn 2/61)

Full scorecard here.



Since day one (whenever that was, the end of last year's Ashes I guess), I have remained fervently in support of Michael Hussey's place in the team far more than that of Marcus North, despite no real ostensible difference in their performances. Hussey is Mr Cricket. He gives off a vibe of someone who when it really matters, at a defining crossroads in his career in the most important of cricketing contests, would rise to the occasion. Today he showed his true colours with a fine unbeaten 81 which has in all likelihood saved Australia's blushes.

Hussey's aggressive intent from ball 1, particularly on the back foot and against an oddly reticent Graeme Swann was a joy to watch. He came to the crease at the most highly charged and challenging of moments, with a fired up English attack having taken the double break through of Simon Katich and Ricky Ponting to bring the game back to an even keel. Aside from an edge just shot of first slip on the first ball he faced, Hussey looked totally in control. His crucially timed partnership of 77 with Brad Haddin, which will resume tomorrow, took Australia from the precarious position of 5 for 143 to a strong position at stumps.

The day started positively for Australia with Shane Watson and Simon Katich surviving a good spell of pressure bowling from England’s pace triumvirate. All the luck was on the openers’ side, including a reverse LBW decision when Katich was initially given out for 27. Watson soon took control, confusing the lengths of the English bowlers when he became the first person in the game to pick apart the full length he ironically had pioneered a day earlier. His ferocious drives down the wicket took him past Katich to 36 before Anderson had him caught at slip by the captain Strauss, the very next ball after an unsuccessful review of a not-out LBW decision.

Watson’s dismissal left Australia at 1 for 78 but Katich and Ponting were able to survive to lunch and ensure their front running position at 1 for 96. After lunch all hell broke loose. With the 2nd ball of the afternoon session James Anderson, who bowled with great probing discipline all day, had Ponting out for 10 caught behind flicking off his legs. Four runs later, after reaching a well compiled 50, Katich offered Steven Finn a return catch and his first Ashes wicket. With this two-pronged blow, Australia had Michael Clarke and Michael Hussey new to the crease. Clarke had yet to answer questions about his bad back while Hussey as ever was fighting for his place in the team. But you wouldn’t have thought so by the way he played, quickly going on the attack against Swann and moving to 20 in no time. Clarke did not have the same luxury of supreme confidence, to say the least. He looked jumpy, rhythmless and overall rather third rate in his 50 balls of struggle before inevitably getting out for 9. Speaking of inevitability, Marcus North then failed. North had just 1 when he made an amateurish lunge at a fairly innocuous traditional off spinner from Swann and edged straight to Paul ‘Eddie McGuire’ Collingwood at slip. At 5 for 143, England’s score of 260 was suddenly looking decidedly competitive. But Brad Haddin, playing with admirable restraint, supported Hussey through to tea and then onwards. Australia would probably have reached a lead by stumps had the umpires not gone off 18 overs early on a completely arbitrary bad light basis. In a frustrating quirk of irony, the heavens then opened and ensured the day’s play was complete.

The match remains very alive, but save for a big collapse tomorrow morning, Australia should be well on the way to a healthy first innings lead, including a vintage Hussey hundred with luck. Bear in mind that Australia must bat last on a pitch of questionable durability, so they optimally need to reach as close to 400 as possible tomorrow and then bowl very well in the 2nd innings. Any 4th innings target beyond about 150 will not be easy.

Highlights
*** -  Mike Hussey without a doubt. A quality score is never out of the question but the intent and style of his innings was tremendous, possibly his best knock since the vintage of 2005-07.

** - Shane Watson and Simon Katich. Australia's unlikeliest all time great opening pair continue to impress with another solid 78 runs today. Their foundation could prove key to an Ashes winning summer.

* - Movember. I should really have mentioned them yesterday seeing as Australia were bowling, but in all the excitement I scarcely had time to even think about them. But Mitchell Johnson, Peter Siddle and Ben Hilfenhaus' moustaches are truly fantastic. There is a very pleasing three musketeer quality about Johnson's pornstar look, Hilfenhaus' cut short handle bar hash job (thanks to Mr Hilfenhaus who vetoed the full handle bar) and Siddle's grub which inexplicably somehow completely suits his face. All for a worthy cause too.

Lowlights
*** - Michael Clarke. Yes above Marcus North. I know everyone's allowed a bad day but Clarke's was a particularly awful day today. The demons that kind of an innings can cause don't usually heal fast. A first ball duck would probably have been far less damaging to his confidence and Australia's overall Ashes chances. 
 
** - Marcus North. I feel quite sorry for North because he's an honest hard-working cricketer and I have a lot of respect for what he does. Once he gets in he can reach Rahul Dravid-like levels of concentration and immovability, usually without the pervasive boredom as well. But he hardly ever reaches double figures nowadays. If he doesn't do something big in the 2nd innings this could be his last test, but I would hope Australia don't find themselves in a last innings position sufficiently desperate to need such heroism.

* - Bad light delays. As the Channel Nine commentators alluded to, a review is badly needed of the archaic rules relating to bad light. Leaving the field if ambient light becomes insufficient was implemented before the time of helmets and door-sized under-clothes padding specifically as an option if the umpires deemed it a hazard to the physical health of the players to continue. This is hardly a problem nowadays and Bad Light calls have become inherently tactical, especially as traditionally an umpire will 'offer' the opportunity to leave the ground to the batsmen. Late afternoon periods of fading light will always be supremely tough to bat during and no mentally sane batsmen is going to decline a bad light offer. Think of the drama we'd get in Test matches with some nice juicy periods of play in the dusk.

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Top Ten: Memorable Australian Hat-Tricks

In the wake of Peter Siddle's spectacular hat-trick in the 1st Ashes test at the Gabba yesterday, we are reminded of some of the other iconic Australian hat-tricks, often invariably against the English and with a quite uncanny regularity at the MCG.



Fred Spofforth - Test Match vs England @ MCG, 1879
Notable primarily as the first hat-trick in Test history. The honour of such a landmark was deserved by no man above "The Demon" Spofforth, the first truly great fast bowler in the Test age and the first to 50 test wickets.  In just the 3rd Test match , 2 years after the game had debuted in Melbourne, Spofforth clean bowled English middle order batsman Vernon Royle and Francis McKinnon before Tom Emmett was caught by Tom Horan. The trio of wickets left England at a paltry 7/26 and they did well just to reach 113. Australia still emphatically won by 10 wickets, Spofforth going to take 13 wickets in the match and making a valuable 39 with the bat.

Hugh Trumble - Test Match vs England @ MCG, 1904
When Australia's premier off spinner at the turn of the century, Hugh Trumble, dismissed Bernard Bosanquet, Plum Warner and Dick Lilley amidst a match-winning 7/28, he became the first of only three bowlers in Test history to achieve his two hat-tricks in his career. Trumble had achieved his first three peat at the same ground against the same opposition and in the final test series of his long career, the follow-up served as a fitting bow on a glittering career.

Jimmy Matthews (x2) - Test Match vs South Africa @ Old Trafford, 1912
Wily leg-spinner Jimmy Matthews played just eight tests for Australia, all within a 12 month period. But he forever holds a place in the annals of cricket for a feat surely never to be repeated for all of Test cricketing eternity. In the curious Test Triangular Tournament between England, Australia and South Africa in 1912, Matthews took two hat-tricks. This alone is a feat only matched twice in Test history but this is not the reason for its magnificence. Matthews pair came in the same match, and more than that, on the same day. After a big firsts innings from Australia, Matthews took the last three South African wickets consecutively midway through the 3rd day to enforce the follow on. Within the next two hours he took the 5th, 6th and 7th South African wickets with three balls. Completing his stunning achievement was the fact that they were his only six wickets of the match, all six required no fielding assistance (2 bowled, 2 LBW and 2 caught and bowled) and South African wicket keeper Tommy Ward had the misfortune to be the 3rd wicket in both hat-tricks.

Mervyn Hughes - Test Match vs West Indies @ Perth, 1988
The people's favourite, big bustling Merv Hughes became the first Australian to take a Test hat-trick since Lindsay Kline three decades earlier against the dominant West Indians of the 1980s. What made his hat-trick all the more remarkable however, was that it remains the only Test hat-trick ever to be achieved over three different overs. Hughes had Curtly Ambrose caught behind off the final ball of his 36th first innings over, then after off spinner Tim May went for nine runs at the other end, Hughes came back to finish the innings by having No.11 Patrick Patterson caught, completing a five wicket haul. The in-form Hughes was handed the new ball if the 2nd innings and promptly trapped legendary opener Gordon Greenidge with the first cherry.

Damien Fleming - Test Match vs Pakistan @ Rawalpindi, 1994
Australia's 90s swing king Damien Fleming became only the third bowler in history, and only Australian, to take a hat-trick on his test debut in Pakistan in 1994. Fleming had impressed in the first innings of the series opener with 4/75 but Pakistan had fought back from the brink to sure up a draw on the back of a majestic double century from their star batsman and would be disgraced drug cheat Saleem Malik. At a nauseating 3 for 469, Fleming finally got the breakthrough when he had Aamer Malik (no relation) caught at mid wicket by Michael Bevin for 65. Inzamam-ul-Haq was LBW next ball and after the tension of waiting a full over for his chance, wrote himself into history not just for a hat-trick on debut but legitimised his feat as one of true significance by having the immovable Saleem caught behind for 237.

Shane Warne - Test Match vs England @ MCG, 1994
England typified their 90s ineptitude in the 2nd Ashes test at Melbourne when they threw away a potentially competitive position and collapsed to 6 for 91 in the final innings. Backing up a mesmerising 6/64 in the first innings, Australia's newest sporting hero Shane Warne came on and trapped Philip DeFreitas LBW for 0 before Darren Gough edged to wicket keeper Ian Healy next ball. Batting tragic Devon Malcolm came in at No.10, and lunged his burly body forward in an ungainly manner to a ripping wrong'un. The inside edge was caught and David Boon, on his 34th birthday showed the exuberance of youth to make a spectacular diving snatch low to the ground, and help to etch another ironic memory into the Warne folklore.

Anthony Stuart - One-Day International vs Pakistan @ MCG, 1997
This hat-trick makes the cut more because of my own nostalgic bias. It was the first hat-trick I ever witnessed on TV and as a 6 year old boy I was mesmerised by the drama. Stuart was a little remembered but hard working New South Wales fast bowler who never played a Test and featured for Australia only really during this 1996-97 summer of ODIs. With good old honest fast seam bowling, Stuart had Ijaz Ahmed and Mohammad Wasim edging to Healy behind then Moin Khan to Taylor at first slip. The joyous enthusiasm of his celebration was infectious.

Glenn McGrath - Test Match vs West Indies @ Perth, 2000
Perhaps the most memorable and sensational of all Australian hat-tricks (though Warnie would have a case to argue), McGrath ran through a typically hapless West Indian top order during Australia's 5-0 whitewash of a frankly woeful opposition. McGrath came to Perth on 298 Test wickets with much anticipation surrounding his joining of Dennis and Lillee and Shane Warne as the only Australians with 300 Test wickets. In the press before the match McGrath joked about the perfect script being the removal of stubborn opener Sherwin Campbell for wicket no.299, then McGrath's old nemesis and batting legend Brian Lara for No.300. Two beautiful seaming balls on the off stump line fulfilled this perfect prophecy as both Campbell and Lara edged helplessly into the slip cordon. But not even McGrath could have hoped for the bonus that came from Jimmy Adams popping the next ball, an off target short delivery, straight to Justin Langer at bat pad.

Brett Lee - One-Day International vs Kenya @ Durban, 2003
There is no greater example of the power and ferocity of Australia's great contemporary super speedster than the way he rattled the bones, in one case literally, of an outclassed Kenyan top order during a preliminary match at the 2003 world cup. In the 4th over of the match, with Kenya 0/3, Lee banged in a rip snorting bouncer which cannoned into the elbow of opener Kennedy Otieno and cruelly ricocheted onto the stumps. Celebration for the wicket quickly gave way to concept for Otieno however when it became quickly clear that he was a considerable amount of distress. After writing in pain at the edge of the pitch, Otieno was helped from the ground by team-mates, his badly broken arm being gingerly supported. But it takes more than a pulverised forearm to scare Lee off his trade. His next ball was even faster and No.3 Brijal Patel had no idea, snicking it straight to Ponting, and the next ball was faster still, a violent yorker which easily beat a hapless David Obuya and bowled him neck and crop.

Peter Siddle - Test Match vs England @ Brisbane, 2010

With ten years since McGrath took Australia's last Test hat-trick, and seven years since Lee's effort, Australian cricketing fans had forgotten the joy that comes with a dramatic spectacular hat-trick. Siddle's effort could scarcely have been more dramatic, even including the first Decision Review of a wicket in a Test hat-trick. Although Siddle is not the pace of Lee and did not cause any physical damage to the English batsmen, his hat-trick is reminiscent of the awesome toe crushing power of Lee's. Let's hope we have to wait a shorter amount of time for the next hat-trick (Doherty in the 2nd innings anyone?).

Simple Siddle does the trick

Australia vs England, 1st Test - Day 1
Thursday November 25 2010.


England - 260 (Bell 76, Cook 67, Siddle 6/54)
Australia - 0/25 (Katich 15 n.o, Watson 9 n.o)

Full scorecard here.





The halcyon days of McGrath, Lee and Gillespie and Warne may seem like a distant memory for the Australian bowling unit, but there is life in the old dog yet. What’s more, the sources of this revival in hope and enthusiasm are far from what you’d expect.

For all the talk of an inconsistent, inexperienced attack and their presumed struggle at taking 20 English wickets, Australia has surprisingly healthy pace stocks. The core of Mitchell Johnson, Ben Hilfenhaus, Doug Bollinger, Peter Siddle and Ryan Harris are backed up by the promising young talent of Clint McKay, Mitchell Starc, Peter George, Josh Hazlewood, Trent Copland and Mark Cameron, just to name a few. Meanwhile on the spinning side of things, the plethora of been and gone candidates since the great one’s retirement, while hardly ideal, at least speaks to the depth of near-international quality spin bowling in a country not evolutionarily designed to support the art. But with the developments of the past 12 months, Johnson, Hilfenhaus, Bollinger and Hauritz locked in as incumbents and the vibrant young brigade being given their due, few would have picked Peter Siddle as Australia’s next great bowling hero, and surely none would have thought of Xavier Doherty as the man most likely to take the spin bowling chance and grasp it with both hands.

It is the variety of our quick men which makes them at once threatening and frustrating. The wild, unreliable and dangerous slinger Johnson. The McGrathesque (or maybe DamienFlemingesque would be more appropriate for his prodigious ability to swing the ball and his consistent if always varying spot of minimal facial hair) Ben Hilfenhaus. The left arm new ball specialist Doug Bollinger, with all the cult excitement he stirs up. Peter Siddle somehow appears to be the misnomer, the eggshell amongst broken glass. He is straight up and down, a hard-working, toiling, honest bowler with a mean 140something speed on his day. He’s not quite the gun slinging wild child that is Johnson or the ever-reliable Hilfenhaus. He inexplicably doesn’t even feel remotely like Bollinger, even though they both essentially fill that same intermediary role between Mitch and Hilfy. Siddle, and I mean no disrespect because he is a match for anybody in the world at being so, is one of those bowlers who seems to possess little variety in his arsenal. Invariably he bowls them straight, without prominent swing, at a consistently fast but not spectacular pace, and I wouldn’t have it any other way. While some may have doubted his natural ability, no-one I know has ever disliked Siddle. He is a man whose work ethic would be unmatched even in the most heinous Nazi concentration camp, and if that isn’t enough to miff any survivors of Auschwitz, the indecent joy and happiness with which he seems to do his work every day surely would. Now on perhaps the most important day of his short test career, he’s gotten all rewards he’s deserved for his years of passion, and then some.

A full decade has passed since an Australian last took a test hat-trick (Glenn McGrath against the West Indies in 2000). It is two years longer since the feat was achieved in an Ashes test, by Darren Gough in Sydney in January 1999, a match I was privileged enough to attend, my first as a spectator. Siddle’s hat-trick is reminiscent of Gough’s in that it was the most spectacularly pure and aesthetically pleasing that a hat-trick can get, with two shoe-splitting yorkers firing under Matthew Prior and Stuart Broad’s bats. The ball that got rid of the stubborn Alastair Cook to start the rout was a gem in itself, finally enticing the cautious opener to push ever so slightly outside off stump and edging to the slips.

Siddle’s 6/54 was the hallmark of engrossing day of test cricket at its absolute finest on a beautiful if somewhat sluggish pitch offering a little something to everybody, including the makers and sellers of sawdust. Australia fought hard to dismiss England for 260 by stumps. Simon and Shane Watson ensured Australia’s upper hand by lasting until stumps with the score on 25, Katich looking particularly confident in his aggressive welcoming of Graeme Swann to Ashes cricket at the Gabbatoir.

If the recent tradition of the nerve-jangling opening over providing a glimpse into coming fortunes is anything to go by, Australia are in very good shape. After the interminable pre-series hype and as the climax of the much anticipated first ball began to subside, England’s captain and most important batting stabilizer hit the third ball of the series straight to Michael Hussey. Short outside off stump is not what Ben Hilfenhaus had in mind for his first wicket of the series, but it was nevertheless an extremely clever delivery, deviating back at the left-handed Strauss just enough to cramp his cut shot, a sure fire way of getting yourself caught in the cordon. England 1 for 0. It was the kind of spectacular start that always seemed likely, and for a fleeting moment thoughts of England all out for 30 by lunch flashed through the mind. But a positive start from No.3 Jonathan Trott, and the typical uninspiring stoicism of Alastair Cook began what was a gripping contest all day.

Trott looked in fine touch and it needed a jaffa to remove him, Shane Watson seaming a full ball back in through the gap and disturbing his stumps. As ever Watson was penetrating and difficult to play, and it was Watson who recognised the need to be full and straight. With the slow pace and tinge of green in the wicket, a length bordering on the half volley becomes the new good length ball. So it proved as Watson removed Trott with the perfect ball for such conditions, and inspired Siddle when he returned to the attack after what had truthfully been a scratchy opening spell.

Siddle’s full deliveries outside off accounted for Kevin Pietersen on 43, just when he looked ready to take the match from Australia after showing a headache inducing streak of vintage form, and Paul Collingwood for just 4. At 4 for 125, the in form Ian Bell and the defiant Cook fought back, with a partnership of 72 before all hell broke loose. After Cook’s vigil ended on 67 in the waiting hands of Shane Watson, and Matt Prior was comprehensively bowled, Siddle had to wait an extra minute or two for confirmation of his hat-trick as Stuart Broad played the controversial Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS) card to challenge his palpably plum LBW decision. Broad was struck on the toe on the full, not going close to digging out the searing if rather fortuitous yorker Siddle ended up delivering.

Siddle’s 6th wicket was Graeme Swann for 10, another plum LBW and another pointlessly wasted decision review. Pietersen and Ian Bell were the only batsman who looked to have mastered the conditions, and the overall consistent (apart from Johnson arguably) Australia bowling. Bell played perhaps his best innings against Australia, attacking test debutant Xavier Doherty with particular gusto on his way to 76 before rather inevitably become Doherty’s first test wicket.

My judging standard may be particularly low after all the spin troubles we have had, but Xavier Doherty had to me an absolutely sensational debut innings with the ball. His surprise inclusion over Nathan Hauritz and Steve Smith, despite a frankly woeful first class bowling average of 48 over nearly a decade, was said to be the result of a certain big game quality the selectors saw in him. His four wickets on One Day International debut recently against Sri Lanka gave the earliest glimpses of this and rose to the occasion today. Doherty, a containing one-day bowler by trade really, bowled typically tightly and with great discipline, every bit the match of Hauritz’s cool temperament. More than this, for a supposedly straight up and down containing limited overs bowler he seemed to get a notable amount of purchase out of the wicket, turning the ball far more consistently and often considerably further than Hauritz usually managed. He remains unlikely to ever really run through a team and no doubt the pitch offered him an unusual amount of assistance for a Day 1 Aussie test pitch, but given the context of his meteoric rise and distinctly unimpressive average, his performance was nothing short of sensational. The only blemish on Doherty’s day was a tough but catchable chance he dropped from Cook at cover point earlier in the day.

It is easy to get caught up in the hype of what was really a magnificent day of test cricket, silencing the long form’s doubters. But the truth of the matter is that England’s 260, if their bowlers can do the job tomorrow, may not be that far off the mark. Australia has the disadvantage of batting last on a pitch that has shown signs of likely wear and tear as the game progresses. Australia’s performance was far from flawless either. Ponting’s tactics remain decidedly questionable and Mitchell Johnson showed little to suggest he won’t be carted around the country for the next six weeks, although he will surely have one of those inevitable destructive spells in there somewhere. England were in a fighting if not dominant position of 4/197 before Siddle’s hat-trick, and without the collapse could very easily have gone close to 400, an ominous score on such a economical pitch.

These are all petty details though on a day that was first and foremost, enthralling top level sporting competition, and most importantly for the partisan Aussie, overall a very successful and promising day. These Ashes aren’t a foregone conclusion yet for the Poms.

Highlights
*** Siddle’s enterprising fast bowling and sensational hat-trick. Fast bowling of the like has rarely been seen in Australia or the world for the matter for some years. The last comparable spell I remember is Mitchell Johnson’s destruction of South Africa in Perth two years ago.

** Doherty’s mighty mature performance, the perfect foil for Siddle’s heroics.

* Channel Nine reigning themselves back from the uncontained idiocy of the early summer games to present a focused and, unprecedented within the past few years, almost passing for acceptable commentary. Michael Slater is still annoying as a commentator though. And Mark Nicholas is still a pompous idiot.


Lowlights
*** Kevin Pietersen. While his batting at full flight is always a highlight visually, his form today was worrying. It is too early to make elaborate judgements from one innings of 43, but he’s showing every sign of another return to form just in time for the Australians.

** Mitchell Johnson. My constant criticism may seem overly harsh and he didn’t bowl particularly atrociously today, certainly not compared to the trash he can throw down. My concerns remain however. If we get to about the 3rd or 4th test and his consistency hasn’t improved and his devastating spell hasn’t come yet, it might be time to bring Dougie back for Mitch. Hilfenhaus/Siddle/Bollinger is as formidable a pace attack as any. I think I’m just biased against Mitch because a tattoo artist has made his arm look like a charcoaled log after a bushfire. He was so attractive too.

* Mitchell Johnson’s tattoo. There are other Australian problems to bring up but they are not yet sufficient as to cause grave concern. After such a good day of cricket it’s a fitting tribute to only have two genuine lowlights. Besides that tattoo really is bad.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Ashes Preview

CRICKET

Australia vs England 2010-11, 1st Test
Wooloongabba, Brisbane
November 25-29 2010


Deja-vu for Ricky Ponting as he hands another
Baggy-green to another untried spinner.

The last time England won an Ashes on Australian soil was in 1986/87, on the back of Botham's heroics and Chris Broad's metronomic century making. By 1989 Allan Border's touring party, supposedly noteworthy only for its profound inability to threaten the English, had regained the urn 4-0. In both cases the respective teams were given little to no chance before the start of the series. The 2005 Englishmen were in a similar boat, Australia's 239 run win the opener at Lords surely being a sign of the same old Aussie dominance.

Pre-series turmoil, uncertainty and ever-widening odds seem to be one of the most favourable conditions to win an Ashes series in recent decades. One can only hope this will apply in 2010-11 considering the stark contrast in the preparation of the two teams. England arrives in Brisbane with the old urn in hand, and with their most stable and cohesive unit perhaps in decades. Meanwhile all is crumbling under poor old Ricky Ponting. Ponting may be a flawed captain lacking of the tactical nous and imagination of a Taylor or a Waugh, but he surpasses all comers as Australia’s greatest contemporary batsman. As can be forgotten at times, he also holds the most wins as a test captain in the 133 year history of the game, 47, from 73 games at a percentage few have matched in test history. But beyond all his achievements, if Australia is unable to regain the prevailing memory of Ponting’s captaincy will, rightly or wrongly, be his cursed Ashes record.

Australia’s pre-Ashes state of play cannot have been this ghastly for at least two decades, maybe three if we stretch back to the days of World Series Cricket and the purging influence it had on contracted Australian test stocks. The focus of the past few days has been twofold. First on the agenda has been Michael Clarke, and his fight to temporarily alleviate his fundamentally unfixable back for Brisbane, maybe to the detriment of later dates in the series. Xavier Doherty’s surprise inclusion to make his test debut has been the other account of note. But these two stories shift the focus away from perhaps the most telling sign of Australia’s panic, and the selectors uncertainty, more even than picking a first test squad bigger than England’s entire touring party. Doug Bollinger, who has bowled consistently and with great enthusiasm for the past year and had results as good as any other Australia bowler has been left out in favour of Peter Siddle. The reason given for this is an apparent lack of match fitness, despite the fact that Bollinger put the miles in on the subcontinent and Siddle himself is recently back from an injury layoff of far longer duration and consequence. In the heady days of Australian dominance never would such a kneejerk reaction have come about, borne out of the fear of a strike bowler breaking down. Any bowler can break down at any time no matter how unforeseen the circumstances, English quick Simon Jones attested to that eight years ago when he pulverised his knee in the Gabba outfield in the first session of the series. The message the selectors have sent to Johnson, Hilfenhaus, Doherty and co, that they aren’t trusted to be able to carry an injury-hit attack, is not what our talented but particularly temperamental bowling attack need. Enough has been said about the continuing plights of Michael Hussey and Marcus North, and little more can be said until they bat. If one thing can be said for Hussey, it is that he can rise to an occasion magnificently.


All the theoretical early running is with England. Andrew Strauss’ men arrive at the Gabba today on the verge of outright series favouritism, even a few months ago the betting was traditionally Australia-favoured. It is important to keep the hype in check however. England has at least twelve or thirteen solid international performers but few stars. Andrew Strauss, Kevin Pietersen and Graeme Swann are the only three who look able to consistently threaten to take the game from Australia. Collingwood and Bell when in form can be stoic and if not kept in check, prolific. Jonathon Trott is a star of the future. James Anderson brings much-needed experience to the pace attack. Then there is Stuart Broad, who while wholly less impressive than much of the pre-match dialogue suggests, does nevertheless give rise to Aussie demons as thoughts of The Oval 2009 flitter unwisely back into the mind. Even within the three stars only Strauss fully convinces me. Pietersen remains in an extended run of unimpressive form, as well as retaining a kind of arrogant nonchalance for his wicket bordering on the pathological. Swann has been a consistent performer the world over for the past 18 months and certainly Australia would give anything for as stable a spin option, but his value to the team could be more psychological as his forceful personality keeps the Poms in the right frame of mind. Unless he performs in Australia, which I am sceptical about apart from potential troubles in Sydney or Melbourne depending on pitches, I remain unconvinced. He’s not a Harbhajan or a Murali. He’s not a Warne.


Warne. Even four years after his retirement he’s nearly as talked about as any current player. The word from Ian Healy this morning is that Strauss may seriously consider bowling first merely because of the confidence gleaned from not having to face Warne in the 4th innings. This strikes me as a very big and wild jump. For all the talk of cold temperatures, green tops and potential invitations to the opposition to bat, it would overall be extremely unlikely if either captain did anything other than emphatically choose to bat. Ponting has batted on far greener pitches and would still have nightmares about Edgbaston 2005 when he put England in and was trashed for 407 inside the first day. Strauss on his part can't pretend to forget Nasser Hussain’s famous debacle of 2002 when he let the Australians have first use of a belter of a Gabba pitch. The key for this 1st test relies on how either team’s top order handles the lively early overs after inevitably choosing to bat first.
For all the expectation of this Gabba test and all the clichés pertaining to how the first session of a series can often define the final result (or indeed the first ball as in 4 years ago), I can’t help but feel the Gabba test this year might not be so foreshadowing. Australia has shown in both 05 and 09 that they can dominate an opening test and then consistently fall short of the mark and lose the series. As much as there’s an overall feeling of worry and concern about our fading chances, predictions would be impossible at this stage. The only prediction I will make is that if Australia win the 1st test the series will stay very much alive, but if England go 1 up, the climb back will be a huge one.

Likely Elevens

Australia
Shane Watson
Simon Katich
Ricky Ponting (C)
Michael Clarke
Michael Hussey
Marcus North
Brad Haddin
Mitchell Johnson
Peter Siddle
Xavier Doherty
Ben Hilfenhaus


England
Andrew Straus (C)
Alastair Cook
Jonathan Trott
Kevin Pietersen
Paul Collingwood
Ian Bell
Matthew Prior
Stuart Broad
Graeme Swann
James Anderson
Steven Finn