Australia's unlikely new recruit Michael Beer,
still looking thoroughly shell shocked.
The Australian selectors look like they have come full circle in their horrendous desperation, and have now become a distinctly unamusing parody of 90s England revolving door policies. The squad for Thursday's 3rd Ashes Test in Perth includes unknown Western Australian left-arm spinner Michael Beer, who only made his first class debut in October and has been picked supposedly for a knowledge of the Perth pitch despite only moving there from Victoria in this past year. Clearly the move smacks of desperation and has been panned from all corners. However it distracts (perhaps not without intent) from what is for once a well chosen squad. Although Beer being selected in the 11 would be an eyebrow-raising move, logical evidence (which unfortunately can't be relied upon when it comes to our selection panel) would suggest that Beer surely will not play, and that consequently the squad is a clever one.
The hype over Beer has overshadowed some astute selection calls. Conventional wisdom said Marcus North, Xavier Doherty and Doug Bollinger must go, and they have. Steven Smith, Mitchell Johnson and Ben Hilfenhaus have returned and although it would be nice to see a new fresh batsman like Usman Khawaja, the focus has to be on fixing the bowling horrors of the first two Tests. Australia have picked a perfectly balanced squad for this vital Perth Test. However this is all conditional (and its a big if) on Beer not playing. Make no mistake I rate young Beer, in fact as astonishing as it may seem I had heard of him properly before this week. But the other eleven in this squad of twelve must surely be the correct team for Perth, out of anyone not just this set of twelve.
Obviously, with reason, people must ask why Beer would be selected over the experienced and in form Nathan Hauritz. Or if the selectors insist on troubling England with left arm orthodox spin why not opt for New South Welshman Steve O'Keefe who impressed against the Poms playing for Australia A. But the selectors from what I can tell have their eleven decided already, and if the fight is for a position as token twelfth man Beer does no harm. The reason the eleven seems set is because the needs of a notoriously spin-unfriendly Perth pitch, and the rigidity of the squad means there can only be one plausible team. Watson, Hughes (replacing the injured Simon Katich), Ponting, Clarke, Hussey, Haddin, Smith, Johnson, Harris, Siddle, Hilfenhaus. Hauritz or O'Keefe may be obviously more qualified to play than Beer, but truthfully neither would fit into the team based on the squad picked. Furthermore having bowlers of that calibre could result in Ponting and the selectors failing to resist temptation and playing the specialist spinner, which would be a mistake. Playing a Hauritz or an O'Keefe with Smith would mean two spinners, something irrational for the demands of the Perth wicket. The only other option would be playing Hauritz/O'Keefe ahead of Smith, which would dramatically affect the balance of the side. Even with both Hauritz and O'Keefe being useful lower order batsmen, it would be very poor judgement to rely on a batting lineup with an out of form and short on confidence Mitchell Johnson at 7. Five bowlers only works when one of them is the all-rounder Smith.
On the surface it would seem that if a batsman like Khawaja or Callum Ferguson was picked instead of Beer, that would give the squad a better overall balance and offer more flexible options. Digging deeper even this proves untrue through. Playing an extra batsman at No.6 would mean one of two things. Either there would be four fast bowlers and no spinner, not the smartest option. Or Smith would play at No.8 which again is clearly a badly balanced side with one too many batsmen, and only three front line bowlers. With Beer in the squad he operates as a safe 'designated twelfth man' while the prescribed eleven can focus on preparation for the match.
It may seem rather cruel to hand the young man what looks like a miracle debut on his home track only to relegate him to 12th man, but I don't doubt Beer is aware of the plan. If the eleven is indeed set then there's no reason not to give a promising young player a week in the Aussie squad to really learn and help him develop as a player. I don't know if I'm being too lenient on the selectors but I just like the idea of bringing in an exuberant fresh face to remind the boys of the passion and excitement playing for Australia should bring, as opposed to bringing in an old hand like Hauritz to create needless selection dilemmas and dissatisfaction on the part of whoever is chosen not to play.
Maybe Hilditch and co are just panicking and we'll see our twelfth spinner in five years.
Australian Squad - 3rd Test vs England @ Perth, December 16-20
Ricky Ponting - Captain
Michael Clarke - Vice Captain
Shane Watson
Philip Hughes
Michael Hussey
Brad Haddin
Steven Smith
Mitchell Johnson
Ryan Harris
Peter Siddle
Ben Hilfenhaus
Michael Beer
No comments:
Post a Comment